Phrase Under God Is Devoid of Religious Meanings and Public Schools Should Continue Reciting Pledge of Allegiance Free Essay Example, 1250 words

The Supreme Court revoked the Ninth Circuit's decision that had refused to increase the number of judges on the bench to rehear the case and had declared the phrase Under God unconstitutional. According to the Ninth Circuit, the pledge of allegiance violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment since it endorsed a religion. The highest court of appeal thus overturned the ruling on a number of reasons most of which questioned the basis and efficacy of the entire case as filed by Michael Newdow. The Supreme Court ruled that Michael Newdow did not have any standing to sue on behalf of his daughter. The ruling reversed the decisions of the Ninth Circuit based on procedural law. As such, the Supreme Court did not consider the constitutionality of the issues that arose from the case as discussed in the ninth circuit. As explained earlier, Michael Newdow was the father of the pupil in question. However, she did not have the custodial rights of the child. On December 4, 2002, Sandra Banning, the child s mother, filed a motion seeking to intervene or dismiss the entire case as filed by Newdow. We will write a custom essay sample on Phrase Under God Is Devoid of Religious Meanings and Public Schools Should Continue Reciting Pledge of Allegiance or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now She argued that while they shared the custody of the girl, a court in California had granted her exclusive rights of the child. Such rights included the right to provide the child with legal representation. Her arguments were vital and changed the course of the case even before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court, therefore, debated on the suitability of Michael Newdow to provide the child with legal representation. The Court thus concluded that he did not have any rights and did not have any to sue for the child. The decision declared other rulings on the case null and void. Impact of the rulingThe decision of the Supreme Court showed the constitutional nature with which the justice system in the United States operates. The Supreme Court investigated the procedure and constitutionality of the case as filed by Michael Newdow. Apparently, Newdow did not have any legal rights to represent the child a feature that declared the entire case un-procedural.