Group Working Skills Essay

As its saying Two Heads Are Better Then One, what if there were more than than two, people prefer fiting with their friends, or others in a root word to achieve their goals easier, but nowadays point studies require a sorting work, and nightimes the genus Phallus of it ordain be chosen randomly, so they would in all probability face so many enigmas that would affect achieving their goals, those problems can be actual with some strategies and dynamic that Im going to provide and disassemble it with an example.In my origin foundation year I have been compulsory to work in a chemical sort to do a Business Plan that represent 40% from the final grade, the gathering was chosen randomly, I faced some problems during the work that affected our assemblage working, the main ones are related to Organisation or structure the host more specifically on NORMs, and COHESIVENESS. Payne,E. and Whittaker,L (2000) argued that GROUP DYNAMIC is the name given to the way that a group deals with factors that affect it from indoors itself there is some aspects to a group that can be identified much(prenominal) as, Norms, Goals, Roles, Size, ropiness, and Structure of it.The aim of this move is to discuss an example of my previous group work, and analyse it according to group dynamic concepts. As I mentioned being in a group required to do Business Plan, the group goal was to present a new idea of a product in the UK, and explain how to dictated it up, and count the expenses and market it as we learned, however it was important to us because the work was 40% value from the final mark. In the group there were 6 members, so the group was required to do a final demo of the business plan, and we also was required to meet twice a week. beginning(a) base we faced Two main problems, this work was require some creativity and different ideas, and some of the members were too quiet and they dont worry to share their ideas with other members on the group specially in merchandising the product part, so we had some problem in Organisation and Structure, in the main in structure which Payne, Whittaker(2000,p60) defend it as some type of a group structure will arise spontaneously because most scholar feel more comfortable given a framework within which to work. Also Payne,E. nd Whittaker,L (2000) argued that whether if the members of the group consciously aware of some certain problems of structures aspect happens to some members of group or non, but the other will be influenced from their patterns behaviour, and in all groups this kind of behaviour are chiefly unwritten, and majority of patterns accept it without realising it, these behaviour called Norms.To avoid such a problem and get around the work, according to Pyne, Whittaker,(2000,p62) argued that Norms al slipway develop in groups and will comptroller or inhibit the behaviour of individual members in a particular(a) set of circumstance. In solving this kind of problems Payne,L. and Whittker,L(2000) belive that there are ways in norms to develop the work and group may come with a particular develop norm to encourage everyone to work and perform heights quality of work, and norms always there exist even if the group was not aware of it. In solving and avoid this particular problem happened, in group is good to have Coordinator For example, Coordinator will join members ideas and suggestion unneurotic and coordinate the activities.Other problem that we faced was, because half of the member were keeping same nationality, the other members find it difficult to deal with them or even to get knowing them more, because they were always together and prefer to speak in their own language, so the group faced a problem with COHESIVENESS, as it argued is a good dynamic to develop a group, Payne, Whittaker(2000,p65) Cohesiveness is by and large used to refer to the degree to which members desire to stay in the group and express agreement with the group goals.But there was also some disadvantages of Cohesiveness that related to the problems that we faced, Payne, Whittaker(2000,p66) argued that Too much similarity of the behaviour of group members leading to increased cohesiveness, can actually be detrimental to cognitive operation. So Developmental Stages of group provide stages that would jock solving Cohesiveness disadvantage mentioned above, which is in stage one GETTING TO KNOE YOU, Payne, Whittaker,(2000P67) argued Group member will attempt to discover which behaviour are acceptable and unacceptable.This is a period of getting to know each other, deciding on goals to pursue, and getting organised. To conclude, I believe that working in group require so many dynamic that helps the members in achieving the group goal easier, while doing so each member will face less problems in working.As it mentioned in the essay about two dynamic that will develop the group unity was setting up some norms that will help and encourage other member to produ ce high quality of work, and the first stage in developmental stages of groups, which was Getting To Know You stages that argued how to accept and nonstandard members behaviour and decide the goals to peruse. On other hand each group must be aware of problem facing to avoid such problems affecting in their goal achievement.