John Sayles Men With Guns (Hombres Armados) :: Film Movies Analysis

John Sayles men With Guns (Hombres Armados)In Men with Guns, John Sayles depicts a feudal economicalal clay in an agricultural South American setting. use the travels of Dr. Fuentes, a pertain doctor from the city, to reveal numerous aspects of peasant life, Sayles shows the economic whirlwind in which these peasants are caught. Men With Guns demonstrates how the feudal economic system operates by revealing the economic and political power the comfortable plantation owners consume and lord over their lessers.A cruel cycle in which the rich people produce check out and the poor people are pin down with no instruction to rescue themselves, feudalism is a hierarchical trade system. The people with m one(a)y in Men With Guns are the belt downlords, the owners of the plantations. These people ostensibly ascendancy the lay that they own as well as the net profit from the output their land produces, but they also control the government, the army, and consequently, the co mmon people. This approach omnipotent control forces the common people into a feudal family relationship. Unless the peasants snuff it on the feudal plantations, they will starve. The army ensures their reliance on the plantations by kicking them dispatch of all arable land, leaving them with no victuals and no employment. Committing themselves to the wholly employers in the region, the peasants are forced into a feudal relationship. They are held in this relationship by the army, which goes to extreme measures to maintain control of the peasants. Maintaining feudal conditions through with(predicate) violence and intimidation, the army holds the populace in a constant postulate of worry. Guaranteeing that the peasants dumbfound ill and in need furthers the indispensability that they work to stay alive, but precludes them from doing so. This is the paradox of the poor worker, but one the army does not see. The army blindly kills anyone who tries to help the peasants, murd ering all the doctors and priests that enroll the villages. They do so to keep the peasants in need and in ignorance, to prevent them from learning other way of life. Lacking knowledge of the outside initiation ensures that the peasants will quell in the plantations, because fear of the unknown is stronger than fear of the known. performing as feudal knights, the army forces people into the feudal plantation relationship using fear and intimidation.Because the peasants do not make specie or get nourishment according to the amount of time they work or the amount of chore they produce, the managerial role of the army becomes a compulsion for the motivation of the workers.John Sayles Men With Guns (Hombres Armados) Film Movies AnalysisJohn Sayles Men With Guns (Hombres Armados)In Men with Guns, John Sayles depicts a feudal economic system in an agricultural South American setting. Using the travels of Dr. Fuentes, a concerned doctor from the city, to reveal numerous aspects of peasant life, Sayles shows the economic whirlwind in which these peasants are caught. Men With Guns demonstrates how the feudal economic system operates by revealing the economic and political power the rich plantation owners possess and lord over their lessers.A cruel cycle in which the rich people maintain control and the poor people are trapped with no way to rescue themselves, feudalism is a hierarchical market system. The people with money in Men With Guns are the landlords, the owners of the plantations. These people obviously control the land that they own as well as the profit from the output their land produces, but they also control the government, the army, and consequently, the common people. This near omnipotent control forces the common people into a feudal relationship. Unless the peasants work on the feudal plantations, they will starve. The army ensures their reliance on the plantations by kicking them off of all arable land, leaving them with no food and no empl oyment. Committing themselves to the only employers in the region, the peasants are forced into a feudal relationship. They are held in this relationship by the army, which goes to extreme measures to maintain control of the peasants. Maintaining feudal conditions through violence and intimidation, the army holds the populace in a constant state of fear. Guaranteeing that the peasants stay ill and in need furthers the necessity that they work to stay alive, but prevents them from doing so. This is the paradox of the poor worker, but one the army does not see. The army blindly kills anyone who tries to help the peasants, murdering all the doctors and priests that enter the villages. They do so to keep the peasants in need and in ignorance, to prevent them from learning another way of life. Lacking knowledge of the outside world ensures that the peasants will remain in the plantations, because fear of the unknown is stronger than fear of the known. Acting as feudal knights, the army f orces people into the feudal plantation relationship using fear and intimidation.Because the peasants do not make money or get food according to the amount of time they work or the amount of labor they produce, the managerial role of the army becomes a necessity for the motivation of the workers.