The Image of the Turks         Through push through history the footrest Empire was looked upon as having a barbaric and lustful multitude. This was the idea of a absolute majority of Western Europeans. Andrew Wheatcroft wrote The fairys to signal on the nose how the Europeans did look on the Turks. This news report shows how the feelings toward the Ottomans created stereotypes that lasted centuries.         The Europeans looked upon the Turks as level forms of compassionate beings, much give care Adolf Hitler pictureed the Jews during realism state of war II. Europeans were prejudiced towards the Turks because they did not understand the Muslim bulk or their religion. Wheatcroft used a quote by Francis Bacon to show the belief of the Europeans in the sixteenth-century: With aside virtuousity, without letters, arts or sciences; a batch that apprise sc prowe measure an acre of land or an minute of arc of the sidereal d ay; base and sluttish in building, diet and the wish; and in a word, a rattling(prenominal) reproach to human rules of order¦it is truly said concerning the Turk, where the Ottomans horse sets his foot, throng get along with up very thin (231). The Turks were considered to be a very dangerous group of people. The Europeans were really scared of them. They would meet in battle and thousands of crazy Turkish warriors called bashi-bazouks would appear, rampaging with swords in the shape of a crescent. The Europeans had never seen whatsoever thing like this before and they didnt purloin what to think. These bashi-bazouks fought like no other warriors and were similar to modern day Marines in being the first line of defense. The Europeans looked at these bashi-bazouks as bloodthirsty savages (234). They were accused of raping the women and pillaging the cities they would conquer, knowing good and advantageously that the Europeans would do the same when they conquer ed a city or nation. Wheatcroft writes, The ! round-eyed folk drawings from the Greek War show Egyptian soldiers and janissaries red death Greek women, while Greeks (in their white kilts) are besides shown attack enemy soldiers. Yet we know that many thousands of Turkish women and children were killed, lots with appalling barbarity, in the Morea (234). In India, when the British were a commutation power from 1857-8, there were similar acts of savagery performed by the British. They were on a campaign of racial terror, hanging closely any Indians on whom they could get their hands in an riot of requital (235-6). They sought to torture these people because hanging was in addition quickly a death for such terrible people. adept voice of the torture inflicted upon the Indians is included in Wheatcrofts book: The near established form of dispatching mutineers to strap them to the front of a cannon, and excrescence them in half, often so that their scattered remains would pleach the faces of their fountain comrades, lined up to observe the execution (236).         These acts of savagery by the Europeans were just as bad and sometimes worsenedned than what was through by the Turkish people.

The Europeans fear of these mad Turks caused a dower of racial strife in which the Europeans turned any expression of the Ottoman Empire into a reproach of society. These views of the Turkish people did not fade a air with the fall of the Ottoman Empire. evening to this day, Europeans carry a certain fear of the Turks. Wheatcroft explains: The reach of the Turk, fade away and constantly reforming, will nev er be free from its cabalistic roots: In European fe! ars of elicit and violence looming out in the East (239).         It was not that the Turks were worse than the Europeans, it was just that they were different. They believed in a religion, Islam, which had very different moral standards from Christianity. Since it wasnt the same smell of the Europeans and their Catholic religion, it was considered wrong. This is similar to the way mainstream Christians view the religions that consider the intervention of snakes to be part of their worship service. These singular religions are often the victims of stereotypes and misunderstandings concerning their beliefs.         In The Ottomans, Wheatcroft uses many examples to illustrate the conflicts in the European and Turkish beliefs that caused the prejudices between the two. He proves that stereotypes are not always to be taken as fact. The only way to get erstwhile(prenominal) labels on other people is to find out for yourself who people really are . If you want to get a bounteous essay, allege it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment