Case note: Blackpool and Fylde Aero Club v Blackpool Borough Council

CONTENTS PAGE: Facts of the shell.............................................................3 Procedural history...........................................................4 Legal issues in dispute......................................................4 The decision..................................................................3 Analytical word of honor of the implications for the principles of law regarding offer and acceptance............................................6 Current law in Australia regarding offer and acceptance..............10 Theoretical perspective.....................................................12 Conclusion...................................................................14 Bibliography.................................................................17 Blackpool and Fylde Aero gild v Blackpool Borough Council Facts of the Case: The Defendants, a local anaesthetic anesthetic council, owned and controld Blackpool Airport, and since 1975 had minded(p) the Plaintiffs club a fitting to operate pleasure flights divulge of the airport . In 1983 when the stand firm concession was to expire, the Council sent aside to seven potenti every(prenominal)y concerned severaliseies (including the Plaintiff) an invitation to crank for a trinity year concession. The invitation was in super C form, it stipulated that the Council does non bind itself to accept all or any vocalism of any tetchy and that all tenders were to be submitted in the envelope provided with the top(prenominal) confidentiality in mind. It further stated that any tenders authorized afterwards the eon and time specified would not be considered. The Plaintiffs stick on their tender in concurrence with the time specifications and book of instructions.

However because of an panic the Town Clerk supply failed to empty the letter corner that day and subsequently the Plaintiffs tender was recorded as world too late for consideration. The Defendants current another tender (lower than the Plaintiffs) and the indian lodge then bought an action against the Council for smash of contract and negligence (which date not be discussed here). The take on contended that the Council had warranted that if a tender was veritable in accordance with their instructions it would be duly considered and the Council had acted in breach of that warranty. Procedural History: The case originated in the Queens work bench Division at Manchester... If you deprivation to get a all-embracing essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper